top of page

The Biggest Killer in the Workplace Isn’t Accidents — It’s Occupational Disease

  • Writer: Dr. Jalees Razavi
    Dr. Jalees Razavi
  • Dec 11
  • 3 min read

A Strategic Brief for Employers, Regulators, and Unions


ree

For more than three decades, safety performance has been judged by a familiar set of indicators: lost-time injury rates, near-miss counts, incident investigations, and compliance audits. These measures are essential, but they are also profoundly incomplete.


Organizations often celebrate low incident rates as proof of a safe workplace.


However, when viewed through the lens of Occupational Medicine and global epidemiology, a different picture emerges:

If your incident rate is low but your cancer rates are high, you do not have a safe workplace.

You have a risk management failure with delayed consequences.

Accidents are visible and acute — they generate rapid response.

Occupational diseases, in contrast, emerge silently over 10–30 years.

Yet these chronic conditions account for the majority of work-related deaths worldwide.



This is a critical governance gap for employers, regulators, unions, and policymakers.


The Hidden Majority of Work-Related Harm

Acute injuries — falls, crush incidents, confined-space events — are devastating, but they represent the smallest proportion of total work-related mortality.


The diseases that dominate the burden of occupational harm include:


  • Occupational cancers linked to diesel exhaust, silica, welding fumes, asbestos, and firefighting exposures.

  • Chronic lung diseases from silica, isocyanates, fiberglass, metal fumes, and poor ventilation.

  • Cardiovascular events associated with heat stress, shift work, sleep disruption, and chronic overload.

  • Respiratory impairment driven by long-term exposure to dusts, fumes, and combustion products.

  • PTSD, operational stress injuries, and moral injury in first responders and frontline workers.


These conditions rarely appear in annual safety reports because they emerge after latency periods measured in decades.


The absence of immediate symptoms does not equal the absence of harm.



Why This Matters for Employers

1.  Lagging Indicators Are Masking Real Risk

Incident rates capture only what happens abruptly.


They do not reflect what is accumulating slowly — exposures, physiological strain, and organizational pressures that will translate into disease.


2. Legal and Financial Liability Extends for Decades

Occupational cancers and chronic diseases generate long-tail claims with substantial compensation costs.


Boards and executives must recognize that decisions made today determine liability profiles 10–30 years from now.


3. Workforce Stability and Long-Term Productivity Depend on Chronic Disease Prevention

Cardiac disease, respiratory impairment, cancers, and mental health injuries drive early retirement, disability, absenteeism, and turnover.


Healthy workers stay longer, perform better, and reduce replacement and training costs.


4. ESG and Public Accountability Are Expanding

Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting is increasingly scrutinizing:

  • occupational disease prevalence

  • exposure control programs

  • long-term workforce health trajectories

  • Incident rates alone are no longer a sufficient marker of “safety performance.”


Why This Matters for Unions

Unions are uniquely positioned to advocate for hazards that cannot be seen or measured without scientific assessment.


Just as unions drove progress in asbestos protection and hearing conservation, they can lead the next era of prevention focused on:

diesel and welding fume exposure

silica and engineered stone

heat stress and cardiovascular protection

safe staffing and workload

psychological safety and trauma-informed policy


A low incident rate does not guarantee a healthy workforce.

Members deserve protection from both acute injuries and long-latency diseases.


Why This Matters for Regulators

Regulatory frameworks have historically emphasized acute event prevention.


However, modern scientific evidence now supports the need for stronger:

  • exposure surveillance systems

  • real-time exposure monitoring

  • mandatory reporting of occupational diseases

  • enforceable workload and shift-work protections

  • improved ventilation, engineering controls, and heat management

  • cross-jurisdiction data sharing


Regulation must evolve to match the profile of modern disease burden — not the profile of incidents from 30 years ago.


What Leaders Must Do Now

Occupational disease is preventable, but only when organizations adopt a long-range view of risk.


This requires shifting from an incident-centric model to a health-centric model.


Priority Actions

Implement exposure surveillance, not just incident surveillance.

Evaluate cumulative risk, not isolated hazards.

Integrate occupational disease metrics into board-level reporting.

Strengthen staffing, workload, and organizational design.

Invest in engineering controls, ventilation, and hazard elimination.

Ensure mental health prevention is structural, not individual.

Partner with unions and regulators on long-term risk reduction.


When leadership focuses only on incidents, they manage the smallest portion of harm.


When they focus on exposure, workload, and organizational design, they prevent the outcomes that truly devastate workers and families.


A Final Message to Senior Decision-Makers

Accident prevention saves lives today.

Occupational disease prevention saves lives for the next generation.

Both are essential.

But only one is currently under-recognized, under-measured, and under-regulated.

It is time to address the silent epidemic.

Comments


bottom of page